War metal is musically closer to grindcore than it is to metal


The defining characteristics of grindcore are:

  1. Emancipation from the structural rigidity of traditional metal. Where metal retains its compositional character, grindcore cares little for such considerations, and in fact pursues a ‘destructional’ agenda that seeks to boil music down to its most primal elements without entirely losing the appellate of “music”. This is a fine line that is far too often overstepped by grindcore bands but the best grind remains that which retains a semblance of memorability.
  2. Very liberal use of blastbeats that loosens the interlocking between riffs and drums. Punk beats serve as occasional respite from the aural terrorism.
  3. The use of leitmotifs that usually act as bookends and thematic hooks for the listener to identify individual songs which, otherwise, frequently dissolve into a blur of white noise difficult to be told apart.
  4. Between these leitmotifs lie extremely fast-transitioning power chords and alternately-picked sections. Individual components hold little logical interplay in the greater context of a song but it can be argued that the point of grindcore is to undermine the conventional idea of a song.

Listening to a band like Blasphemy, considered the archetypal war metal band by clones, right after hearing Napalm Death‘s Scum or CarcassReek Of Putrefaction, or something even more stripped-down and noise-based like Fear Of God (Switzerland), one can’t help but notice the adherence to the above list of checkpoints. Blasphemy have always called themselves Black Metal and they add the occasionally gratuitous, chaotic guitar solo to distance themselves from the minimalist grindcore ethic, but these are merely surface distinguishers. Hardcore breakdowns abound on Fallen Angel Of Doom, while chord progressions generally mimic the recursive aspects of punk music, albeit with greater emphasis on constant tremolo-picking.

The biggest difference between grindcore and war metal is in ideology; where grindcore is overbearingly and self-righteously leftist, the bands that call themselves war metal are politically incorrect to a fault, advocating nothing short of perpetual war and chaos. One would like to think that this is a metaphor, implying continuous strife, both inner and outer, as an irreplaceable requisite for man’s self-enlightenment. But whether this is the correct interpretation or just a cool pose to adopt would perhaps be better answered by the bands themselves or the masses of hoodie-wearing, sunglasses-flaunting fans so devoid of critical discrimination.

The structuralist school of thought suggests that the elements within a system are endowed with their meaning based on the hierarchical interrelationships within, or their synchronicity with each other. In other words, an element loses its meaning in the absence of a counter or an opposite. “Good” only means something in the presence of “bad”; take away the existence of the “bad” and the word “good” loses the positive connotations that are associated with it. While this line of thinking may indicate that there is nothing in the world with intrinsic worth of itself, and that this binary opposition ignores the gradient necessary to the evolution of concepts and ideas, it is a useful tool when applied to thinking about music, metal in this case.

In terms of metal, which is composed and hence obeys fundamental structural laws, i.e. it isn’t open to reckless improvisation or ambiguity over interpretation of its constituents or as a whole, the individual riff, as cool as it may sound, means nothing if it doesn’t occupy a meaningful niche in the larger, structural sense. For dialogue to occur between the different parts of a metal song, there has to be logical crosstalk between adjacent riffs and a connecting thread that shares the same genetic material through its running length. Contrasting different aspects of a song against each other is paramount so that each individual aspect stands out in relief against the larger backdrop.

Where grindcore and war metal part ways from real metal is in the way they subordinate the song to the moment. By disrupting the musical, narrative fabric that metal has upheld  over time, grindcore and a lot of war metal position themselves in the postmodernist camp that shuns traditional values. This is to be expected of grindcore but the real irony is that of war metal and the dichotomy that follows between its thought and action. War metal would like to be thought of as true metal but an inevitable existential crisis ruins its claims to such legitimacy.

This entry was posted in Black Metal, Death Metal and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to War metal is musically closer to grindcore than it is to metal

  1. Shiva says:

    a lot of the blasphemy riffing style is directly lifted from Blood/Repulsion. in fact there is a riff on ‘Blasphemous Attack’ that is identical to a riff from ‘The Stench of Burning Flesh’. its funny how a member of proclamation will make outrageous remarks like how only the blasphemy school of black metal is valid when it in itself is, apart from its raw, grating and morbid aesthetic in addition to its satanic/occult themes; not too different from the early grindcore stuff.

    the point where black metal’s riff approach became truly distinct is with Euronymous – rapid bathory-style riffing instead backed by an ambient edge that reaches the pinnacle of the narrative ability of metal. that is a truth all war metal fans need to accept, regardless of their notions of what is ‘true’, despite the fact that blasphemy precedes most of the norwegian wave (sans mayhem).

    anyway, i really can’t think of any outright blasphemy clones except proclamation. who are these clones you refer to in specific?

  2. Anonymous says:

    This post, while attempting to take an analytical look at war metal fails to see beyond the surface and makes the mistake of comparing surface level elements of the two genres. The author here is ignoring, forgettin, or is perhaps completely unaware of the musical lineage that led to the development and further evolution of war metal. It is true that war metal and grindcore share some superficial musical similarities, and it is also true thar Blasphemy, the progenators of war metal are fans of punk and grindcore, the fact remains that war metal evolved directly out of first wave black metal. The primary influence on war metal’s sound is releases such as In The Sign of Evil, Bathory’s first three albums, Hellhammer/Celtic Frost, Sarcofago’s INRI, and so on. And the influence of death metal bands such as Incantation in the continued evolution of the genre cannot be overlooked, neither can the influence of Beherit’s early demos and and albums. These are things that are simply not present in grindcore to any significant degree. One could reasonably argue that war metal is the form that black metal would have taken had the second wave bands from Norway not taken over the term. War metal bands share a lot more in common with black metal bands such as Archgoat from Finland, Demoncy and Profanatica from the US, and even Von from the US than they do with any grindcroe bands.

  3. Pingback: Human Agony – Putrescence Of Calvary (2019) | Old Disgruntled Bastard

  4. Anonymous says:

    wow. all those big fucking words just to let everyone know youre a pussy that can’t handle truly extreme forms of music. you’re a fuckin nerd and a poser

  5. Anonymous says:

    If War-Metal and Grindcore aren’t “True Metal” then True Metal is for the weak. Pose all you like, Blasphemy and Last Days Of Humanity are the two final filters.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s